Pilgrim Pipeline: myths vs. reality

The proponents of building the Pilgrim Pipeline in New York and New Jersey have a professional public relations staff twisting half-truths, and non-facts into spin purporting to show the ‘benefits’ of burying their crude oil pipeline through our communities.  What do we have, besides a large water supply and the health of ourselves and our children we want to protect?

Thanks to CAPP volunteers, we now have a point-by-point rebuttal of Pilgrim’s arguments and spin.  A new PowerPoint presentation called Pilgrim Pipeline: Lies, Deceptions, Hypocrisies and Delusions is available on the CAPP web site.  Among the claims we challenge are:

  • “the 178 mile pipeline will create 2,000 temporary and 50 permanent jobs”
  • “new pipeline technology is safer than old”
  • “the overwhelming majority of pipeline incidents relate to older pipelines”
  • “by any statistical analysis, pipelines are the safest form of petroleum transportation” [a big whopper]
  • “Hudson … closures due to Sandy prevented oil shipments and caused gasoline shortages across the region”
  • “we have eminent domain under NJ law and the right to enter property under federal law” [an even bigger whopper]
  • “the pipeline won’t leak,” BUT
  • the pipeline “will replace trains” … “won’t replace trains” … “may replace trains”
  • “resistance to the pipeline has come primarily from outside groups”
  • “the more people hear about this project the more they will like it” [comic relief here?]

A lot of these sound reasonable on the surface, right?  Read here why they aren’t so reasonable and are downright misleading!  Or, click here for the PDF version of the presentation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s